|
 |
CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORT
|
|
The Local Plan’s objectives with regard to transport are:
- to encourage greater use of public transport, cycling and walking and to reduce
the need for car journeys;
- to make conditions safer for cycling and walking;
- to cater effectively for the transport needs of disadvantaged people including
those without cars;
- to provide a wide range of safe travel choices;
- to promote efficiency in the transport needs of local services and businesses.
TRANSPORT
- Policy TR1 – The Location of Development
- Policy TR2 – Pedestrian Access
- Policy
TR3 – Cycling
- Policy TR4 – Movement Corridors
- Policy TR5 – Transport
Interchanges
- Buses
- Air Travel
2.1 There has been an increasing emphasis, through planning policy guidance, on
reducing the need to travel and providing greater transport choice through the
planning system. PPG13 (Transport) advocates that Local Authorities should
integrate transport and land-use planning; this is a key element of sustainable
development. PPG13 sets the following objectives:
- to promote more sustainable transport choices for both people and moving
freight;
- to promote accessibility to jobs, shopping, leisure facilities and services by
public transport, walking and cycling; and
- to reduce the need to travel,
especially by car.
2.2 PPG6 (Town Centres and Retail Development) also
emphasises the sequential approach to development in selecting sites for retail,
employment and other key town centre uses, and the revised PPG3 (Housing) makes
it clear that housing development should be located so as to reduce car
dependence and facilitate access by other modes of transport. The dispersed
nature of settlements in East Lindsey makes this is a greater challenge. There
are key issues of social exclusion related to people’s inability to access
services. It may limit people’s choice of education or employment opportunities
if they do not have access to a car, as public transport may not operate at
times that enable them to access them. It can also exacerbate rural poverty as
people need to run at least one car to be able to access the range of household
activities, such as education, shopping and employment. However, these are all
issues that need to be tackled within the framework of sustainability. 2.3 Lincolnshire County Council is the highways authority for East Lindsey and
has responsibility for all roads in the District and is also responsible for
co-ordinating public transport. However, the Local Plan can play a part in
influencing movement by the form and location of new development. The Local
Transport Plan (LTP), produced by Lincolnshire County Council, provides a 5 year
integrated transport strategy for the County and the Local Plan will work to
help active the objectives of the LTP, through the Local Plan and through its
development control function. The council is also working in partnership with
other organisations to influence the provision of public and community
transport, through its Transport Development Officer.
2.4 The Local Plan’s objectives with regard to transport are:
- to encourage greater use of public transport, cycling and walking and to
reduce the need for car journeys;
- to make conditions safer for cycling and
walking;
- to cater effectively for the transport needs of disadvantaged people
including those without cars;
- to promote a wide range of safe travel choices
- to promote efficiency in the transport needs of local services and businesses.
|
Policy TR1
-
The Location of Development
|
The Council will seek to:
- locate major trip generating development in the towns;
- locate development which serves a local catchment in the service
villages;
- elsewhere, only locate development that serves a local need.
Development will not be permitted in locations that unnecessarily
increase the need to travel without there being adequate provision for
walking, cycling and public transport.
|
2.5 One of the key ways in which the planning system can assist the
objectives in paragraph 2.4 is in the location of development. Development that
is likely to generate a lot of visits needs to be sited in an area that is, or
can be, readily accessible by a range of means of transport. The larger
settlements in the district will not only have a greater number of people on the
doorstep who can walk or cycle to the development, but are more likely to be
accessible by public transport. The settlement hierarchy, set out in
Policy CP3,
sets out the hierarchy that will be used for the sequential approach to the
location of development 2.6 In considering proposals for development, the
Council will consider the particular needs of the development, the communities
it serves and the accessibility by public transport. Even within settlements,
the location chosen for development will need to demonstrate how it has taken
into account the needs of its users. For example, facilities that exist to
provide direct services to the public, e.g. doctors’ surgeries and education
facilities, should, wherever possible, be well related to public transport
facilities and be located in the heart of the communities they serve.
|
Policy TR2
- Pedestrian Access
|
The Council will, along with the County Council and other partners, seek to
improve conditions for pedestrians throughout the District.
Development will be permitted only if, where appropriate, it is designed
to enable safe, convenient and attractive pedestrian routes both within the
development and linking into other pedestrian networks.
|
2.7 Walking is a cheap, environmentally friendly means of getting about over
short distances. It not only good from an environmental perspective, but can add
vitality to town centres and natural surveillance in residential areas. However,
people need to view walking as an attractive option. There are many factors,
perceived or real, that deter people from making more trips on foot. Fears over
security and vehicle/pedestrian conflict are high in many people’s minds, and
this is one reason why the school run has become a feature of modern life.
Others include visually unattractive routes, those that skirt development and do
not take the quickest or most convenient route and routes that do not connect
well with each other or public transport facilities.
2.8 Proposals for new development need to show how the needs of pedestrians
have been taken into account. They should not impede existing routes; or if they
do, they should be replaced with ones that are no less convenient or attractive
options to pedestrians. Proposals should show how they connect with existing
pedestrian networks in the area, public transport facilities or other key
community facilities. For example, with new housing development, convenient
pedestrian links should be shown within the development that make it easy for
pedestrians to get to schools, shops or other facilities nearby. |
Policy -
TR3 Cycling
|
The Council will, in conjunction with the County Council and other
organisations, and through its development control function, seek to:
- increase the use of cycling as a means of transport by maintaining
and promoting secure, safe and attractive cycle routes between the larger
villages and towns and within towns;
- promote and improve cycle-parking facilities at public transport
interchanges and in town centres;
- support the provision of recreational cycling routes in the District.
Development that would generate cycle movements will be permitted only
if, where appropriate, it provides secure, safe and attractive cycle routes
and facilities for cyclists.
|
2.9 Cycling has all of the advantages of walking and can be more practical
over longer journeys. However, many of the reasons why people are deterred from
walking apply to cycling. The Council will work with its partners to promote the
use of cycling, both for practical journeys and recreation. New development
needs to show how it has addressed the needs of cycling both in terms of safe
and accessible cycle routes and in providing secure, safe and conveniently
located cycle parking facilities. 2.10 Public transport interchanges, and
rail and bus stations also need to consider the needs of cyclists. The
relatively short journeys which are often required to access public transport
can be undertaken by cycle but people may be deterred if there are no convenient
routes or nowhere safe and secure to leave the cycle. New development at these
facilities should show how this has been addressed.
|
Policy
- TR4
Movement Corridors
|
|
The Council will not
permit development on the disused railway lines shown on the inset maps and
proposals map, which would prevent their use as movement corridors.
|
2.11 There are a number of railway lines throughout the district that are now
disused but still provide an off-road link between settlements. These have the
potential to be used as footpath and/or cycle links, even if it is not possible
to reintroduce the railway. These disused lines can either provide a route in
their own right or contribute to the provision of a wider route that may involve
the use of country lanes, green lanes and other networks. The Lincolnshire
Structure Plan requires the Local Plan to identify these potential movement
corridors. Development may be possible in some circumstances, depending on the
width of the track bed and local conditions. However, if this is permitted, it
should not be allowed to prevent the future used of the line as a movement
corridor. Some of these lines are also Sites of Nature Conservation Importance
and any future development will need to be undertaken in a way that does not
undermine their nature conservation importance. |
Policy
- TR5
Transport Interchanges
|
Development will not be permitted which would prejudice operation of the
bus and railway stations in the district as accessible transport interchanges.
Land is identified on the Inset Map for the future development of a
railway station at Sibsey. Development will not be permitted which would
undermine plans for the future opening of this facility.
|
2.12 Rail is generally a more environmentally sound form of transport than
road and the Council will strongly oppose any cuts in rail services which would
increase road traffic through the District, especially that heading to the
coastal resorts. It will lobby for a more reliable service, which can meet the
demands of the summer tourist season, and local travel needs. The only rail
service in the District is from Boston to Skegness with smaller stations at
Thorpe Culvert, Wainfleet and Havenhouse. Other settlements along the line could
benefit from stopping facilities and the Council would act to support any such
proposal. The only proposal that has been proposed at present is at Sibsey. A
site has been identified on the inset map, and development in or around this
land should not be permitted where it would prejudice these plans. Development
in and around railway stations can also have an impact on people’s willingness
to use services, and the Council will oppose any proposals that adversely affect
the railway stations in the District. The Council will seek to maintain and
improve public transport interchanges and facilities wherever possible.
2.13 The Council will support the expansion of, and oppose any cutbacks to,
the rail service in the District, and seek to maintain and enhance transport
interchange facilities.
|
Buses
2.14 Within East Lindsey, buses are very important in providing the only means
of communication, other than the car, from the larger villages to towns, and
within towns. However, because of the dispersed settlement patterns and
difficulties of providing these services, they are often vulnerable. The Council
is keen to see the level of services maintained and improved to support the
settlement hierarchy set out in the Plan. The InterConnect strategy has improved
the quality and usage of bus services in parts of the district. The Council
recognises this and will continue to support the County Council in maintaining
and extending this service.
2.15 The District Council considers that
public transport services should be maintained and improved to provide daily
work journeys and weekly shopping trips, based on the District's settlement
hierarchy and defined town catchment areas.
Air Travel
2.16 The District does not have its own airport facilities but
Humberside Airport is located nearby, to the north. The range of flights the
airport offers continues to expand and this provides a convenient local facility
for national and international commercial air traffic, as well as private
aircraft. The District Council supports the continuation and development of
Humberside Airport.
 |
|